Chemical product design integrating <scp>MCDA</scp> : Performance prediction and human preferences modelling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Computation‐based techniques and modelling of human knowledge and preferences by using multi‐criteria decision aid (MCDA) methods are integrated in a multi‐scale and multi‐disciplinary approach for the chemical product and process design. The proposed methodology has four main stages: (a) construction of a molecular model for predicting product performance, (b) validation of product performance, (c) selection of alternatives integrating preferences of manufacturers and consumers, and (d) process optimization implementing MCDA methods. The methodology is oriented to find new products that can replace components of formulations, whose performance is already known. It was applied to an exploratory study about the use of glycerol as raw material to produce plasticizers for polyvinyl chloride (PVC), replacing 2‐ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP). The results of the case study and the proposed process design offer promising prospects regarding their application in other chemical products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it