MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Galleguismo y quijotismo: a propósito del tricentenario del Quijote

2020· article· es· W3107834121 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesús Pérez-Magallón

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales Cervantinos · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1905 se cumplía el tercer centenario de la publicación de El ingenioso hidalgo don Quijote de la Mancha, compuesto por Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra. Después de las experiencias de otras celebraciones en el último cuarto del siglo XIX, en particular la de Calderón en 1881, algunos intelectuales españoles proponen una conmemoración grandiosa y espectacular para el tercer centenario del Quijote, idea que retoman los políticos de Madrid. En este artículo vamos a explorar el contexto nacionalista, político y cultural de la propuesta de celebración, pero sobre todo vamos a estudiar cómo es recibida esa propuesta en una nacionalidad histórica como Galicia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales CervantinosSame topicSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207