MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3107914313 · doi:10.7202/1073030ar

SOUS LE REGARD DU PÈRE

2020· article· fr· W3107914313 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Louis-Daniel Godin

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’oeuvre de Lise Tremblay regorge de personnages, de narratrices et de narrateurs dont le quotidien est façonné par l’expérience de la honte. La pêche blanche et La danse juive ont ceci de particulier qu’ils situent dans l’enfance l’origine de la honte, toujours engendrée par un regard de dédain du père posé sur le corps de l’enfant — fils « chétif », boiteux ; fille souffrant d’obésité. Dans l’expérience traumatique de cet affect particulier, le sujet est appelé à assumer son image sous le regard d’autrui ; une image qui ne correspond pas à son désir, mais qui le détermine malgré tout. L’oeuvre de Tremblay présente des pères dont le regard et la voix ont établi les frontières réelles et imaginaires qui contraignent les sujets, tant dans leur corps que dans l’espace. Cet article aborde, depuis une perspective psychanalytique de l’identification, l’articulation poétique particulière entre la honte, la figure paternelle et le corps que l’oeuvre de Lise Tremblay déploie, et qui permet de lire le meurtre perpétré à l’endroit du père dans La danse juive comme le prolongement d’un fantasme parricide déjà mis en récit dans La pêche blanche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et Images→Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research→French-language works237,207→