Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une lecture des livres de Lise Tremblay La héronnière, La soeur de Judith et L’Habitude des bêtes basée sur la façon originale — à notre avis sans équivalent — dont ils mettent en forme l’habitabilité des lieux exurbains de la province. Ces derniers apparaissent comme des communautés opaques et rébarbatives dont la part représentable tient à des réseaux langagiers issus de modes d’échange en principe étranger à la langue littéraire : la méfiance, la médisance, la rumeur. La tâche de l’auteure, qui s’avoue elle-même extérieure à ces réseaux, relève alors bien plus du rapiéçage que de la représentation ou du témoignage. À l’arrivée, la géographie imaginaire que cela dessine nous aide à penser plus avant le rapport de l’écrivain.e du Québec à son territoire, particulièrement en regard des notions d’authenticité et d’enracinement dont on dira que le lien aux espaces régionaux contemporains pourrait souffrir davantage de controverse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".