T1 mapping to assess hepatic and myocardial characteristics in children with single ventricle circulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Single ventricle (SV) palliation, culminating with the Fontan operation, results in passive systemic venous blood flow directly to the pulmonary circulation. Resulting inevitable hepatic venous congestion can lead to hepatic fibrosis. Previous studies suggest hepatic changes can occur prior to the Fontan completion. Besides fibrotic myocardial remodeling may lead to systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction, transmitting back pressure to the pulmonary system. Purpose To compare quantitative T1 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of the myocardium and liver between SV patients and controls, as a potential measure of myocardial and hepatic fibrosis. Methods Retrospective review of 16 SV patients with dominant single left ventricle (SLV, n=6) or single right ventricle (SRV, n=10), at various stages of palliation (pre-Glenn=6, post-Glenn=3, Fontan=7) underwent CMR with myocardial T1 mapping with the liver also in the plane of view. Biventricular patients found to have structurally normal hearts and normal cardiac function on CMR were used as controls (n=21). Native T1 times using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) approach in free-wall of the dominant ventricle at a mid-ventricular short axis in SV and the ventricular septum in controls and, a region of interest in the liver (avoiding any vessels) were measured in all patients. Median and inter-quartile ranges of continuous variables were compared between SV and controls using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results As compared to controls SV patients were (1) significantly younger, (2) had lower ejection fraction, (3) higher median myocardial T1, and (4) higher median liver T1. Also, there was no difference between SLV vs. SRV median myocardial T1 (1056 vs. 1065ms, p=0.43) or liver T1 (678 vs. 729ms, p=0.30) Conclusion Despite younger age, findings of increased myocardial T1 may suggest an element of myocardial fibrosis responsible for the ventricular dysfunction in this population, and that raised liver T1 may be an earlier marker of liver fibrosis, which warrants further study. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".