Impact of antenna correlation on the physical layer security of cooperative relaying with OSTBC system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents an analysis for evaluating the physical layer (PHY) security performance of a two‐hop amplify‐and‐forward cooperative relaying system employing Alamouti orthogonal space–time block coding (OSTBC) in the presence of an eavesdropper, where the transmit antennas for OSTBC are assumed to be spatially correlated. It is also assumed that the authorised main channels as well as the non‐authorised eavesdropper channels follow Rayleigh fading distribution. Closed‐form mathematical expressions are derived for three performance metrics for evaluating the PHY security, namely the probability of non‐zero secrecy capacity, the secrecy outage probability, and the average secrecy capacity. Using the extensive numerical results obtained from the derived mathematical expressions, the impact of antennas correlation on the PHY secrecy performance of the system is studied and evaluated under different parameters. It is also shown that the antennas correlation corresponding to the main channels has more impact than the antennas correlation corresponding to the eavesdropper channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".