A case of diprosopus: a rare form of twinning radiology-pathology correlation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Diprosopus is a rare subtype of conjoined twinning, with approximately 30 reported cases in English literature. Due to the rarity of conjoined twins, the mechanism leading to this developmental anomaly is not yet understood. Case presentation We present a case of diprosopus with multimodality imaging (prenatal and postnatal), and with pathological correlations. Developmental anomalies include partial duplication of frontal lobes, formation of a midline “third” frontal lobe, as well as orofacial and cardiac anomalies. The constellation of anomalies coincide with development during embryonic days 23–26, where the anterior prosencephalon, prechordal plate/oropharyngeal membrane, and cardiogenic plate are in very close proximity to each other. Conclusions This case offers an opportunity to better appreciate the radiologic and pathologic manifestations of diprosopus, and adds to the current body of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".