MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108043990 · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.152

A randomized trial comparing axillary versus innominate artery cannulation for aortic arch surgery

2020· article· en· W3108043990 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark D. Peterson, Vinay Garg, C. David Mazer, Michael Chu, John Bozinovski, François Dagenais, Roderick MacArthur, Maral Ouzounian, Adrian Quan, Peter Jüni, Deepak L. Bhatt, Thomas R. Marotta, Jeffrey Dickson, Hwee Teoh, Fei Zuo, Eric E. Smith, Subodh Verma, Maida Khan, Feryal Saad, Muhammad Mamdani, David A. Latter, Thomas F. Floyd, Paul W.M. Fedak, Aditya Bharatha, Judith Hall, Danusha Nadamalavan, Mohammed Al‐Omran, Ismaı̈l El-Hamamsy, Kevin E. Thorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Michael's HospitalWestern UniversityRoyal Jubilee HospitalLawson Health Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersEthiconJanssen BiotechDepartment of Medicine, University of TorontoIdorsia PharmaceuticalsInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalNovo NordiskDuke Clinical Research InstituteEisaiForest LaboratoriesBristol-Myers SquibbCryoLifeUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterMedicines CompanyBiotronikAstraZenecaAmarin CorporationIronwood Pharmaceuticals, IncorporatedRegeneron PharmaceuticalsRocheNovartisBayer HealthCareSanofiSt. Jude MedicalChiesi EspañaBiosensors International GroupMerckChiesi FarmaceuticiEli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer IngelheimAmgenLivaNovaPfizerUniversity of TorontoAbbott VascularBrigham and Women's Hospital
KeywordsMedicineAxillary arteryAortic archRandomized controlled trialSurgeryCardiologyAortaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgerySame topicAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesFrench-language works237,207