MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3108067404 · doi:10.26565/2075-3810-2020-43-01

6th International conference “Nanobiophysics: fundamental and applied aspects”

2020· article· en· W3108067404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Г. И. Довбешко, V. A. Karachevtsev, V. P. Berest, М. В. Косевич

Bibliographic record

VenueBiophysical Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceNanotechnologyPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6th International conference “NANOBIOPHYSICS: Fundamental and Applied Aspects” (NBP-2019) took place on October 1-4, 2019 at the Institute of Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine). Previous five conferences, starting from 2009, were organized due to joint efforts of B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the NAS of Ukraine and Institute of Physics of the NAS of Ukraine on biennial basis in Kyiv and Kharkiv alternatively.63 leading scientists from 14 countries took part in the conference, Ukraine, Belarus, Italy, France, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Germany, Poland, Check Republics, Canada, Denmark, USA and ARE were represented. 36 scientific lectures, including 17 invited, and 27 poster presentations were made. The goal of the conference was in exchange of information concerning recent achievements in the field of nanobiophysics, aimed at the inspiration of further advancement of basic investigations as well as innovations in the related areas of nanotechnology. Friendly format of the scientific meeting provided the exchange of ideas in such urgent topics as physical properties of biomolecular nanosystems, interactions of biomolecules with nanoparticles and nanostructured surfaces, enhancement of optical processes in biomolecules by nanostructured metal surfaces, formation of nanohybrids of biomolecules with carbon nanostructures, theory and computer modeling of nanoscopic biological systems, applications of bionanomaterials and bionanocomposites. In the framework of the conference special sessions for communications between the participants of the current international projects HORIZON 2020 and NATO Workshop were organized. Book of abstract based on NBP-2019 materials was published.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiophysical Bulletin→Same topicChemical Reactions and Isotopes→French-language works237,207→