MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3108087931 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaa054.114

168 Nursery diets formulated with deoxynivalenol-contaminated corn reduced growth performance but did not modulate the cutaneous hypersensitivity response to ovalbumin or candida albicans

2020· article· en· W3108087931 on OpenAlexaff
Élise Lafleur Larivière, Sabrina Zettell, Rob Patterson, Lee‐Anne Huber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bio-Systems (Canada)University of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminAnimal scienceCandida albicansImmune systemContaminationBiologyChemistryFood scienceImmunologyMicrobiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A total of 144 newly weaned pigs (21 days of age) were used to determine the effect of deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated corn, with or without NutraMix™ supplementation, on growth performance and indices of immune system functionality during the nursery period. Pigs were randomly allocated to 24 pens of six pigs and assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments according to a 2X2 factorial design (n=6); treatments were fed for the 43±1-day nursery period in three phases (phases I, II, and III fed for 8, 14, and 21±1 days, respectively). The factors were clean or DON-contaminated corn and with (2 g/kg in complete diet) or without NutraMix™ supplementation. The DON diets were formulated to ensure a step-up in DON concentration for each phase (3, 4, and 5 ppm in phases I, II, and III, respectively; analyzed concentrations were 3, 3 and 4 ppm). Individual pig body weights and per pen feed intake were recorded weekly. Two pigs per pen were vaccinated against ovalbumin and candida albicans to measure humoral and cell-mediated immune responses by the cutaneous hypersensitivity response test. The ADG (600 vs 693±28 g) and ADFI (979 vs 1110±51 g) in phase III and final BW (25.2 vs 27.1±0.9 kg) were reduced for pigs fed contaminated corn (P< 0.005, P=0.088, and P< 0.05, respectively). NutraMix™ supplementation tended (P=0.086) to improve ADFI (181 vs 142±14 g) in the first week after weaning. All pigs responded to both ovalbumin and candida albicans during the cutaneous hypersensitivity response (P< 0.05), but DON nor NutraMix™ influenced the response. The DON-contaminated diets had the greatest impact on pig growth performance during phase III and when DON concentration was 4 ppm, with no modulation of the cutaneous hypersensitivity response. NutraMix™ supplementation during the early weaning period may be a means to stimulate nursery pig feed intake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food→French-language works237,207→