Bibliographic record
Abstract
Der 1988 erschienene Roman ist sowohl in der Art des Erzählens wie auch in der Wahl der Themen und Motive durch ein komplexes Geflecht aus Doppelungen und Spiegelungen gekennzeichnet. Anlässlich einer Retrospektive ihrer Arbeiten in einer Kunstgalerie in Toronto kehrt die Malerin Elaine Risley an den Ort ihrer Kindheit zurück, wo sie traumatische Ereignisse ihrer Vergangenheit erinnert. Der in der ersten Person erzählte Roman wechselt ständig zwischen den Ebenen der Gegenwart und Vergangenheit. Der Hauptteil besteht aus Rückblicken auf Elaines Kindheit und beschreibt dabei eindringlich das Toronto der 1950er Jahre, bestimmt durch Anglophilie, Protestantismus und eine prüde Mittelklasse-Moral. In der Gegenwart, in der die Protagonistin als Mutter zweier Töchter in zweiter Ehe in Vancouver lebt, reflektiert der Roman kritisch über kulturelle Strömungen der 1970er und 1980er Jahre wie den Multikulturalismus oder den Feminismus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.328 | 0.091 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".