MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108102071

The UNAM-Droplet Freezing Assay: An Evaluation of the Ice Nucleating Capacity of the Sea-Surface Microlayer and Surface Mixed Layer in Tropical and Subpolar Waters (edited by Dr. Michel Grutter)

2020· article· en· W3108102071 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luis A. Ladino, Javier Juárez-Pérez, Zyanya Ramírez-Díaz, Lisa A. Miller, Jorge Herrera, Graciela B. Raga, Kyle G. Simpson, Giuliana Cruz, Diana L. Pereira, Fernanda Córdoba

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmósfera · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce nucleusIce crystalsPrecipitationAtmospheric sciencesSea iceEnvironmental scienceSurface layerMineral dustGeologyOceanographyNucleationMaterials scienceAerosolMeteorologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ice nucleating particles (INPs) in the atmosphere are necessary to generate ice crystals in mixed-phase clouds, a crucial component for precipitation development. The sources and composition of INPs are varied: from mineral dust derived from continental erosion to bioaerosols resulting bubble bursting at the ocean surface. The performance of a home-built droplet freezing assay (DFA) device for quantificatying of the ice nucleating abilities of water samples via immersion freezing has been validated against both published results and analyses of samples from sea surface microlayer (SML) and bulk surface water (BSW) from the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) and Saanich Inlet, off Vancouver Island (VI), Canada. Even in the absence of phytoplankton blooms, all the samples contained ice nucleating particles at moderate concentrations, ranging from 6.0x101 to 1.1x105 L-1 water. The freezing temperatures (i.e., T50, the temperature at which 50% of the droplets freeze) of the samples decreased in order of VI SML > GoM BSW > GoM SML, indicating that the higher-latitude coastal waters have a greater potential to initiate cloud formation and precipitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmósferaSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207