MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108104980 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3040886

A New Type of Ankle-Foot Rehabilitation Robot Based on Muscle Motor Characteristics

2020· article· en· W3108104980 on OpenAlexaff
Daxing Zeng, Huafang Wu, Wenjuan Lu, Xuelin Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAnkleKinematicsRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRobotComputer scienceRehabilitation roboticsSimulationMedicinePhysical therapyArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ankle injury and dysfunction are always accompanied by abnormal peripheral tissues. In order to achieve a more comprehensive rehabilitation training, this article firstly studies the movement characteristics of the surrounding muscles of the ankle-foot. The human musculoskeletal model in OpenSim is used for human exercise experiment. And the relationship between different muscles around the ankle-foot and the direction of the ankle-foot movement are measured respectively, so as to formulate ankle-foot static/dynamic rehabilitation strategies related to the auxiliary training of the ankle-foot muscle. In order to implement the established rehabilitation exercise strategy and to reduce the control difficulty of rehabilitation robot, a new type of decoupling series-parallel mechanism with three rotations and one movement is proposed. After analyzing the degree of freedom and the positive kinematics solution, it is proved that it is completely decoupled in kinematics, can realize the independence of motion control, and there is no singular space. Then, under the premise of meeting the space required for the implementation of the rehabilitation strategy, the proposed new ankle-foot rehabilitation robot is optimized in terms of structure and component size, which improves its space utilization and optimizes the overall mechanical performance. Finally, the dynamic simulation experiment is carried out with the dynamic rehabilitation strategy as the goal, which proves that the robot can realize the normal gait simulation movement in sitting posture, and the motion control of the robot is independent of each other and shows good dynamic performance. Through investigation, the ankle-foot rehabilitation robot designed in this article is cost-effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207