MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108165627 · doi:10.2118/1020-0055-jpt

Technology Focus: Tight Reservoirs (October 2020)

2020· article· en· W3108165627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonard Kalfayan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnconventional oilProductivityGeomechanicsTight oilProduction (economics)Petroleum engineeringNatural resource economicsCabin pressurizationFossil fuelCaprockEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringEconomicsWaste managementGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low-oil-price environment continues to challenge and pressure our industry to reduce costs and optimize production. While cost reductions and efficiency improvements are always the primary focus during downturns such as we are now experiencing, history tells us that many technology and application breakthroughs have been developed in such periods. This is also a time for conducting or supporting technical studies that can provide insight on how operators can optimize production - especially from unconventional-resource developments. In the meantime, major operators are increasingly stepping out, supporting development of alternative, unconventional energy sources, such as natural gas production from gas hydrates, as the industry looks to the future. With reduced new unconventional well activity, practices such as frac-hit mitigation - pressurization of parent wells during child-well fracture stimulation - have become increasingly important to reduce parent-well proppant cleanouts as well as to maximize production from both parent and child wells. With reduced new well activity, it is also increasingly important to dampen the sharp early-time production rate declines as much as possible, having longer-term recovery as the objective rather than just high initial production. Unlike with conventional oil wells, for example, unconventional wells have not seen the same degree of attention placed on the effects of high drawdowns on productivity decline. Two paper synopses featured this month are along those lines. The first, paper IPTC 20260, presents the results of a geomechanics study on rock sensitivity to increasing compressive stress, such as would be experienced with high drawdowns and accelerated depletion. The paper describes and quantifies the stress-dependence of compaction and permeability for anisotropic rock matrix, natural fractures, and hydraulic fractures. The second, paper SPE 197097, discusses the enhancement of frac-hit mitigation treatments with surfactant chemistry, showing that surfactant additive to the child-well treatments can migrate to parent wells, activating oil-recovery mechanisms. Finally, for something different but within the world of unconventional resources, the third paper featured this month, paper SPE 29516, is a report on several offshore gas hydrate production tests in offshore sand reservoirs, which have become more-viable natural gas resource targets given the advancement in hydrate production technologies. The report focuses on key production tests conducted in northern Canada, Alaska, Japan, and the South China Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207