L’Hôpital en santé mentale Albert-Prévost : cent ans d’histoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives In the context of the 100th anniversary celebrations of the Hôpital en santé mentale Albert-Prévost, the present article retraces the history of this pioneering institution in the provision of psychiatric care in the province of Québec. Methods Multiple psychiatrists and health-care professionals who once worked or are still working at Albert-Prévost were interviewed to record their recollection of how psychiatric care was delivered as knowledge about mental illness progressed and how different defining historical events concerning the administration of this institution unfolded. Private and public archives as well as articles documenting the history of this institution were consulted in order to contextualize the participants' experiences. Results A brief exploration of the historical and political context that led to the creation of the Sanatorium Albert-Prévost is provided. The key administrative, political and sociological issues are described at each critical period as well as the interplay between the growing knowledge base about the causes and treatments of psychiatric problems and different models of provision of care as different generations of clinicians search for an optimal practice and organisation of care. It's triple mission of care, teaching and research is described. Conclusion The Hôpital en santé mentale Albert-Prévost has contributed in a significant manner in the shaping of mental health care provision in Québec and several physicians and other health care professionals who have worked there, throughout the past century, have been key contributors to the social, educational, cultural and political advances in this province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".