Regenerating Hair in Prevascularized Tissue Space Formed by a Controllable Foreign Body Reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Intracutaneous transplantation of trichogenic cells is a currently endorsed strategy to realize hair regeneration in vivo. However, skin is not the most advantageous transplant site due to the robust mechanical property and deficient physiological perfusion. Herein, a subcutaneous space made of prevascularized collagen fibers (PVCF) generated by controlling the duration of in situ foreign body reaction is reported. In contrast to skin, an optimally preprogrammed PVCF presents a larger tissue volume (171 mm 3 ), low Young's modulus (1/2‐fold), high flexibility high mechanical energy dissipation rate (1.3‐fold), highly permeable surface structure, and plentiful vascular network. Remarkably, cells transplanted into PVCF suffer less apoptosis and necrosis, and generate more mature hairs (≈289 per site) than that in intracutaneous transplantation (≈177 per site). The RNA‐sequencing profiling indicates similar trends under molecular level. This work provides a promising strategy to improve graft site microenvironment physiologically and mechanically, with a low‐cost and simple fabrication process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".