Bibliographic record
Abstract
En un libro ya clasico, el politico estadounidense Sydney Tarrow puso de relieve los recursos internos movilizados por los y las activistas que se dedican a causas transnacionales, evocando formas de «cosmopolitismo arraigado». Analizando la evolucion reciente de la circulacion entre Francia y Quebec, este articulo muestra, de manera simetrica, como la comparacion internacional constituye una dimension cada vez mas frecuente, incluso obligada, de las practicas sociales y politicas ancladas a nivel local y/o nacional. Asi, y a pesar de las multiples diferencias que caracterizan a estas sociedades, que a menudo son comparadas, Francia y Quebec tienden a constituir un espejo en el que expatriados y expatriadas, investigadores e investigadoras, pero tambien y sobre todo funcionarios y funcionarias, activistas, representantes y periodistas tienden a compararse. Defendiendo una epistemologia reflexiva, este articulo invita por tanto a los comparatistas academicos a cuestionar sus propios metodos, teniendo en cuenta los usos ordinarios de la comparacion entre sus entrevistados (que se comparan a si mismos, tanto como son comparados), asi como los desafios internos de esta comparacion ahora generalizada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".