Radiation exposure causes developmental alterations in size and shape of wings and structures associated with song production in male crickets (<i>Acheta domesticus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Environmental disasters and growth of nuclear power contribute to increasing levels of radiation pollution in the biosphere. Major impacts concern development, fertility, and survivorship in diverse species. Subtle impacts are less appreciated even though they may have profound effects on individuals and populations. Here, we examined radiation impacts on male crickets, Acheta domesticus (L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), specific to wing development. Alterations in global wing morphology are detectable, but this is a flightless species. However, mating success of males is highly dependent on specialized courtship songs generated by structures associated with the opposing forewings. Such signals identify males as both conspecific and ‘attractive/fit’ mates. Highly specialized structures found on male forewings include the chord, harp, mirror, plectrum, and file. These work in concert to generate the species‐specific male courtship song. Even slight alterations in wing morphology can alter these signals, and variation may also vary acoustic signals among populations. Here, we analyze the impacts of early‐life radiation exposure (0–10 Gy) on male forewing shape and size using morphometric analysis. A canonical variate analysis (CVA) illustrated that wing shape was significantly altered in a dose‐dependent basis: 10 Gy (P<0.0001), 7 Gy (P<0.0001), and 2 Gy (P = 0.0001). Principal component (PC) analysis as well as the CVA indicated that most variation in wing structure was associated with the mirror, one of the two main resonating regions on the forewing. Analysis of centroid size found significant reductions with 7 and 10 Gy radiation exposures. Significant radiation‐induced increases in fluctuating asymmetry were also detected, with fluctuating asymmetry values increasing with dose. Due to the known specialized nature of song‐producing structures and its association with both courtship songs and mating, it is likely that the alterations observed in shape and size will have larger impacts on male reproductive success. We are currently quantifying this and analyzing recordings of song structure to detect and characterize specific alterations by radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".