MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108405318 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abccd9

The Radio Luminosity-risetime Function of Core-collapse Supernovae

2021· article· en· W3108405318 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupernovaLuminosityFlux (metallurgy)Type (biology)Standard deviationSpectral lineLuminosity functionErg

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We assemble a large set of 2–10 GHz radio flux density measurements and upper limits of 294 different supernovae (SNe), from the literature and our own and archival data. Only 31% of SNe were detected. We characterize the SN radio lightcurves near the peak using a two-parameter model, with t pk being the time to rise to a peak and L pk the spectral luminosity at that peak. Over all SNe in our sample at D < 100 Mpc, we find that t pk = 101.7±0.9 days and that L pk = 1025.5±1.6 erg s−1 Hz−1, and therefore that generally 50% of SNe will have L pk < 1025.5 erg s−1 Hz−1. These L pk values are ∼30 times lower than those for only detected SNe. Types Ib/c and II (excluding IIn’s) have similar mean values of L pk but the former have a wider range, whereas Type IIn SNe have ∼10 times higher values with L pk = 1026.5±1.1 erg s−1 Hz−1. As for t pk, Type Ib/c have t pk of only 101.1±0.5 days while Type II have t pk = 101.6±1.0 and Type IIn the longest timescales with t pk = 103.1±0.7 days. We also estimate the distribution of progenitor mass-loss rates, , and find that the mean and standard deviation of are −5.4 ± 1.2 (assuming v wind = 1000 km s−1) for Type Ib/c SNe, and −6.9 ± 1.4 (assuming v wind = 10 km s−1) for Type II SNe excluding Type IIn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207