MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108414892 · doi:10.35897/maqashid.v3i2.436

TRADISI PECOTAN DALAM PANDANGAN ILMU SOSIOLOGI DI PAITON PROBOLINGGO

2020· article· en· W3108414892 on OpenAlex
Bashori Alwi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMAQASHID · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyValue (mathematics)AncestorEvent (particle physics)Inheritance (genetic algorithm)HistoryCriminologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The invite tradition in some areas, including in Karang Anom is very interesting to be discussed, because in addition to the people who organize a walimah event giving invitations, they also include goods in the form of cigarettes / soap in the invitation. This tradition is known as pecotan tradition. It is very interesting to discuss in the repertoire of scholars today. Because pecotan tradition indirectly 'forcing' the recipient to bring a reply in the form of money while attending a walimah event.
 Sociolgi view it as a social fact that occurs in society especially coral society Karang Anom, pecotan not just ordinary tradition, but it is inheritance of ancestor which is difficult to be abandoned, although impressed for some people, but on the other side there is high social value that is existence of mutual help helping people around the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it