Rapid Microscopic Fractional Anisotropy Imaging via an Optimized Kurtosis Formulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Water diffusion anisotropy in the human brain is affected by disease, trauma, and development. Microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA) is a diffusion MRI (dMRI) metric that can quantify water diffusion anisotropy independent of neuron fiber orientation dispersion. However, there are several different techniques to estimate μFA and few have demonstrated full brain imaging capabilities within clinically viable scan times and resolutions. Here, we present an optimized spherical tensor encoding (STE) technique to acquire μFA directly from the 2nd order cumulant expansion of the dMRI signal (i.e. diffusion kurtosis) which requires fewer powder-averaged signals than other STE fitting techniques and can be rapidly computed. We found that the optimal dMRI parameters for white matter μFA imaging were a maximum b-value of 2000 s/mm 2 and a ratio of isotropic to linear tensor encoded acquisitions of 1.7 for our system specifications. We then compared two implementations of the direct approach to the well-established gamma model in 4 healthy volunteers on a 3 Tesla system. One implementation of the direct cumulant approach used mean diffusivity (D) obtained from a 2nd order fit of the cumulant expansion, while the other used a linear estimation of D from the low b-values. Both implementations of the direct approach showed strong linear correlations with the gamma model (ρ=0.97 and ρ=0.90) but mean biases of −0.11 and −0.02 relative to the gamma model were also observed, respectively. All three μFA measurements showed good test-retest reliability (ρ≥0.79 and bias=0). To demonstrate the potential scan time advantage of the direct approach, 2 mm isotropic resolution μFA was demonstrated over a 10 cm slab using a subsampled data set with fewer powder-averaged signals that would correspond to a 3.3-minute scan. Accordingly, our results introduce an optimization procedure that has enabled clinically relevant, nearly full brain μFA in only several minutes. Highlights Demonstrated method to acquire optimal parameters for regression μFA imaging μFA measured using an optimized linear regression method at 3T First μFA comparison between direct regression approach and the gamma model Both approaches correlated strongly in white matter in healthy volunteers Nearly full brain μFA demonstrated in a 3.3-minute scan at 2 mm isotropic resolution
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".