MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108460273

SHORT EFFECTIVE INTERVALS CONTAINING PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS AND THE SEVEN CUBES PROBLEM.

2016· article· en· W3108460273 on OpenAlexaff
Habiba Kadiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsModuloArithmeticPrime (order theory)Integer (computer science)Interval (graph theory)CombinatoricsArithmetic progressionPrime numberDiscrete mathematicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. For any > 0 and any non-exceptional modulus q ≥ 3, we prove that, for x large enough (x ≥ α log2 q), the interval ˆ ex, ex+ contains a prime p in any of the arithmetic progression modulo q. We apply this result to establish that every integer n larger than exp(71 000) is a sum of seven cubes. 1. Introduction. Let q ≥ 3 be a non-exceptional modulus, a a positive integer, x> 0 and > 0 some real numbers. One way to establish that the interval [ex, ex+] contains a prime p ≡ a (mod q) would be to determine a condition on x such that

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207