First Whole Transcriptome RNAseq on CHD8 Haploinsufficient Patient and Meta-Analyses Across Cellular Models Uncovers Likely Key Pathophysiological Target Genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2019, we confirmed that the haploinsufficiency of CHD8 does indeed cause the novel syndromic neurodevelopmental disease we first discovered a dozen years before. Here, we report the first whole transcriptome RNAseq gene expression profiling for a patient with this new syndrome, as a preliminary exploration of potential pathophysiological mechanisms. We compared our patient transcriptome profile with that of all publicly available RNAseq datasets from human cellular models including neuronal progenitor cells, neurons and organoids. We compared differential gene expression profiles overall and conducted phenotype-informed data filtration based on the characteristic syndrome presentation. We found that concordance among differential gene expression profiles was poor across all datasets. Nevertheless, remarkably, we show that the patient blood differential gene expression profile most resembled that of the neuronal cell model, a finding that encourages further transcriptome profiling using patient blood samples. In addition, our custom phenotype-informed analyses yielded important, differentially expressed syndrome pathophysiology target genes. Finally, we note that genes dysregulated due to CHD8 heterozygous deletion are linked to known neurological as well as oncological pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".