MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3108521139 · doi:10.7202/1073526ar

L’Hôpital en santé mentale Albert-Prévost, au centre d’un projet musical intersectoriel et novateur

2020· article· fr· W3108521139 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jeanne-Marie Alexandre, Marie-Hélène Tanguay

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsCégep de Saint-LaurentCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanCegep de Trois-RivieresCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Born out of the desire of a generous donor and his children to honour the memory of a loved one, a team of representatives from Montréal Sacré-Coeur Hospital Foundation (MSCHF), employees of the Hôpital en santé mentale Albert-Prévost (HSMAP), and administrators of both Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal and Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel (CÉGEP) de Saint-Laurent was formed to offer musical scholar performances to the HSMAP's clientele. Duos of different backgrounds (classical, popular and jazz), made up of student musicians, were selected to play on a weekly basis, alternating between two floors of the hospital. This article wishes to recount how an innovative and intersectoral project was organized to offer a simple moment of musical listening to HSMAP's hospitalized clientele, and what positive impacts have been identified to date. A look at a project that was initially very personal, but with a very collective impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au Québec→Same topicHealth, Medicine and Society→French-language works237,207→