Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plate anchors are among the most effective anchorage systems that are widely used to resist horizontal and inclined uplift loads in many offshore and onshore applications. Previous research on plate anchors has largely focused on the horizontal or vertical breakout problems, with limited attention directed towards obtaining a full characterization of the effects of anchor orientation angle. The present study utilizes displacement-based finite element analyses to investigate the stability and performance of strip anchor embedded in cohesionless soil for plate inclination angles ranging from 0° to 90° from horizontal, where the applied load is normal to and acts at the center of the plate. This study investigates the effects of scale and roughness, along with the geometry of the failure mechanism for various plate orientations and embedment depths. The analyses, presented in terms of a non-dimensional breakout factor N q , show that the breakout factor increases significantly with an increase in the inclination, especially for angles greater than 45° in loose sand and greater than 60° in dense sand. The analyses also show that scale effects (anchor width) can affect capacity. Finite element analyses have been used to introduce simple design charts relating the breakout factor to the embedment depth and relative density. Comparisons to experimental and numerical studies showed good agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".