MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108695074 · doi:10.7202/1073068ar

Rencontre et représentations des femmes chinoises dans les récits des voyageurs européens aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles

2020· article· fr· W3108695074 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Frédérick Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory, Culture, and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine la représentation des femmes chinoises dans les récits d’ambassadeurs européens des XVII e et XVIII e siècles. S’appuyant sur l’ambassade hollandaise de 1655 mise en récit par Jehan de Nieuhoff et sur l’ambassade anglaise dirigée par Macartney de 1792 à 1794, mise en récit par George Leonard Staunton, ce texte examine d’une part les représentations de la beauté et la construction des genres et soutient, d’autre part que les perceptions à l’égard de la femme sont les résultats du contexte de représentation globale de la Chine à cette époque, soit le passage de la sinophilie à la sinophobie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicHistory, Culture, and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207