MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108943647 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103148

How integral is the α4β7 integrin to HIV transmission?

2020· article· en· W3108943647 on OpenAlexafffund
James Pollock, Rupert Kaul

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAddressinHoming (biology)BiologyLymphocyte homing receptorImmunologyIntegrinImmune systemHigh endothelial venulesT cellMicrofold cellCell biologyCell adhesionReceptorCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defining the α4β7 integrin from an immunologic perspective is relatively straightforward. This heterodimeric glycoprotein is found on activated CD4+ T cells that also express high levels of CCR5, and after binding to its natural ligand (mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1, or MAdCAM-1) it acts as a homing receptor that mediates lymphocyte migration to gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) [1]. Studies from almost twenty years ago found that expression of this gut-homing integrin on T cells was specifically induced after antigen presentation by dendritic cells derived from Peyer's patches in the gut, but not by those derived from the spleen or lymph nodes [2], demonstrating an immune mechanism to “home” responsive T cells back to the mucosal site of pathogen challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207