Increasing Student Learning Outcomes, the Material Determines the Length of Time used in Everyday Life Through Demonstration Methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><em>Based on the problems that arise in this report, the research objectives that will be achieved through the application of the demonstration method using clock media are to improve mathematics learning outcomes about determining the length of time used in everyday life.</em></p><p><em>in class III This research was conducted at SDN 2 Tegalsumur. This research was conducted through 2 cycles where each cycle consisted of 4 stages, namely planning, implementing, observing / observing, and reflecting. The results of the pre-cycle research with the results: from 18 students only 5 students (29%) obtained complete learning. After the improvement in the first cycle of students who completed learning rose to 14 students (77.78%). improvement of learning cycle II can increase student understanding with the results of achieving completeness to 15 students (83.33%). This increase shows that the methods used in the learning improvement process can improve student learning outcomes.</em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it