Object Detection Using Stacked YOLOv3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Object detection is a stimulating task in the applications of computer vision. It is gaining a lot of attention in many real-time applications such as detection of number plates of suspect cars, identifying trespassers under surveillance areas, detecting unmasked faces in security gates during the COVID-19 period, etc. Region-based Convolution Neural Networks(R-CNN), You only Look once (YOLO) based CNNs, etc., comes under Deep Learning approaches. In this proposed work, an improved stacked Yolov3 model is designed for the detection of objects by bounding boxes. Hyperparameters are tuned to get optimum performance. The proposed model evaluated using the COCO dataset, and the performance is better than other existing object detection models. Anchor boxes are used for overlapping objects. After removing all the predicted bounding boxes that have a low detection probability, bounding boxes with the highest detection probability are selected and eliminated all the bounding boxes whose Intersection Over Union value is higher than 0.4. Non-Maximal Suppression (NMS) is used to only keep the best bounding box. In this experimentation, we have tried with various range of values, but finally got better result at threshold 0.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".