MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Training a Neural Network for Lane Demarcation Detection in the Infrared Spectrum

2020· article· en· W3109059966 on OpenAlexafffund
Elizabeth Hofer, Taufiq Rahman, Ryan Myers, Ismail Hamieh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersGovernment of CanadaTransport Canada
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceInfraredTraining (meteorology)Spectrum (functional analysis)Artificial intelligenceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The retro-reflective characteristics of lane demarcations on roadways can potentially provide robust detection in the infrared spectrum even in poor lighting and weather conditions. This paper explores this idea by training a convolutional neural network using Darknet with YOLO to detect 9 classes of road lines from the Berkeley Deep Drive Dataset (BDD). Although BDD is composed of conventional colour images, they were converted to greyscale prior to training as a solution to the scarcity of datasets in the infrared spectrum. The trained model was evaluated on road scenes acquired by the infrared sensor of an Intel-Realsense camera. From the experimental results, it is concluded that object detection techniques primarily developed for localization and classification of objects in the form of bounding boxes are inherently unsuitable for detecting line shaped objects such roadway lane demarcations. In addition, despite the sub-optimal training and detection approach, the performance showed potential for robust lane detection using infrared images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207