MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3109074769 · doi:10.1101/2020.11.30.404087

Unified AI framework to uncover deep interrelationships between gene expression and Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologies

2020· preprint· en· W3109074769 on OpenAlexaff
Nicasia Beebe-Wang, Safiye Çelik, Ethan Weinberger, Pascal Sturmfels, Philip L. De Jager, Sara Mostafavi, Su‐In Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathologyGeneralizability theoryPhenotypeArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDiseaseComputational biologyComputer scienceNeuroscienceExpression (computer science)BiologyPsychologyGeneGeneticsMedicinePathologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Deep neural networks offer a promising approach for capturing complex, non-linear relationships among variables. Because they require immense sample sizes, their potential has yet to be fully tapped for understanding complex relationships between gene expression and human phenotypes. Encouragingly, a growing number of diseases are being studied through consortium efforts. Here we introduce a new analysis framework, namely MD-AD ( M ulti-task D eep learning for A lzheimer’s D isease neuropathology), which leverages an unexpected synergy between deep neural networks and multi-cohort settings. In these settings, true joint analysis can be stymied using conventional statistical methods, which (1) require “harmonized” phenotypes (i.e., measured in a highly consistent manner) and (2) tend to capture cohort-level variations, obscuring the subtler true disease signals. Instead, MD-AD incorporates multiple related phenotypes sparsely measured across cohorts, and learns complex, non-linear interactions between genes and phenotypes not discovered using conventional expression data analysis methods (e.g., component analysis and module detection), enabling the model to capture subtler signals than cohort-level variations. Applied to the largest available collection of brain samples (N=1,758), we demonstrate that MD-AD learns a truly generalizable relationship between gene expression program and AD-related neuropathology. The learned program generalizes in several important ways, including recapitulation of the disease progress in animal models and across tissue types, and we show that such generalizability is not achieved by previous statistical paradigms. Its ability to identify genes with high non-linear relevance to neuropathology enabled us to identify a sex-specific relationship between neuropathology and immune response across microglia, providing a nuanced context for association between inflammatory genes and AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→