MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3109078536 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.02.408922

Autoantibodies Against Ro/SS-A, CENP-B, and La/SS-B are Increased in Patients with Kidney Allograft Antibody-Mediated Rejection

2020· preprint· en· W3109078536 on OpenAlexaff
Sergi Clotet‐Freixas, Max Kotlyar, Caitríona M. McEvoy, Chiara Pastrello, Sonia Rodríguez‐Ramírez, Sofia Farkona, Héloïse Cardinal, Mélanie Dieudé, Marie‐Josée Hébert, Yanhong Li, Olusegun Famure, Peixuen Chen, S. Joseph Kim, Emilie Chan, Igor Jurišica, Rohan John, Andrzej Chruscinski, Ana Konvalinka

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTranslational Research in OncologyToronto General HospitalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibodyAutoantibodyKidney transplantationKidneyAntigenImmunologyHuman leukocyte antigenDonor specific antibodiesInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) causes >50% of late kidney graft losses. Although donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA cause AMR, antibodies against non-HLA antigens are also linked to rejection. Identifying key non-HLA antibodies will improve our understanding of antibody-mediated injury. We analyzed non-HLA antibodies using protein microarrays in sera from 91 kidney transplant patients with AMR, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection (ACR), or acute tubular necrosis (ATN). IgM and IgG antibodies against 134 non-HLA antigens were measured pre-transplant, at the time of biopsy-proven diagnosis, and post-diagnosis. Findings were validated in 60 kidney transplant patients from an independent cohort. Seventeen non-HLA antibodies were significantly increased (p<0.05) in AMR and mixed rejection compared to ACR or ATN pre-transplant, nine at diagnosis and six post-diagnosis. AMR and mixed cases showed significantly increased pre-transplant levels of IgG anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-CENP-B, compared to ACR. Together with IgM anti-CENP-B and anti-La/SS-B, these antibodies were also significantly increased in AMR/mixed rejection at diagnosis. Increased IgG anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-CENP-B pre-transplant and at diagnosis, and IgM anti-La/SS-B at diagnosis, were associated with the presence of microvascular lesions, but not with tubulitis or interstitial/total inflammation. All three antibodies were associated with the presence of class-II DSA (p<0.05). Significantly increased IgG anti-Ro/SS-A in AMR/mixed compared to ACR (p=0.01), and numerically increased IgM anti-CENP-B (p=0.05) and anti-La/SS-B (p=0.06), were validated in the independent cohort. This is the first study that implicates autoantibodies against Ro/SS-A and CENP-B in AMR. These non-HLA antibodies may participate in the crosstalk between autoimmunity and alloimmunity in kidney AMR. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) causes >50% of kidney graft losses. Although donor-specific antibodies against HLA cause AMR, antibodies against non-HLA antigens are also linked to rejection. Serum samples of 91 kidney transplant patients were analyzed using protein arrays against 134 non-HLA antigens. AMR and mixed rejection cases showed significantly increased pre-transplant levels of IgG anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-CENP-B, compared to acute cellular rejection. Together with IgM anti-CENP-B and anti-La/SS-B, these antibodies were significantly increased in AMR/mixed rejection at diagnosis and were validated in a second, independent cohort. Increased IgG anti-Ro/SS-A, IgG anti-CENP-B and IgM anti-La/SS-B were associated with the presence of microvascular lesions and anti-HLA class-II antibodies. This is the first study to implicate anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B and anti-CENP-B autoantibodies in AMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→