MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109108601 · doi:10.1080/00085006.2020.1838726

The Patriarchate of Constantinople: the Mother Church of the modern Orthodox autocephalous churches

2020· article· en· W3109108601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaroslaw Buciora

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthodoxyProclamationSubject (documents)Local churchEcumenismTheologyReligious studiesHistoryPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main subject of debates among contemporary theologians has been the recent split within world Orthodoxy caused by the granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine by the Patriarch of Constantinople. The escalation of the tension within the family of the Orthodox autocephalous churches on the subject of autocephaly and its proclamation continues to be destructive to the unity and conciliarity of Orthodoxy. As this article will discuss, the Ecumenical Patriarchate assumes the role of the centre of the unity of the Orthodox Church and the ecclesiastical motherhood of the contemporary local autocephalous Orthodox Church. She is the “Mother birth giver” and the source of apostolic succession of all the recognized autocephalous churches in the last two centuries. Internally, the Ecumenical See has assumed the role of the faithful guardian of the Ecumenical Councils, based on which she consolidates the internal life of Orthodoxy. As the Mother Church with the authority to grant autocephaly to the local Orthodox churches, including the most recent, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, she solidifies her position and the inner life of Orthodoxy and responsibility delivered to her by the Fathers of the Seven Ecumenical Councils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicReligion and Society InteractionsFrench-language works237,207