Spindle-cell (Sarcomatoid) Variant of Cutaneous Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma (C-ALCL)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) represents one of the entities within the group of CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders of the skin. Most cases are ALK-negative, though isolated cases of ALK-positive C-ALCL have also been reported. By definition, the diagnosis of C-ALCL requires the expression of CD30 in >75% of the cells. Histopathologically, C-ALCL shows a dermal-based nodular and circumscribed proliferation of large pleomorphic cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and eosinophilic cytoplasm, including hallmark cells. Since 1990, isolated case reports of a so-called "sarcomatoid" variant have been published in the literature. Herein, we present a series of 11 cases of spindle (sarcomatoid) C-ALCL, with comprehensive histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular data. Spindle C-ALCL represents a potential mimicker of malignant mesenchymal or hematopoietic tumors in the skin and should always be considered in the differential diagnosis when assessing cutaneous pleomorphic spindle cell neoplasms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".