Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with stable angina and an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background/Introduction Revascularization of the proximal segment of left anterior descending artery (pLAD) demonstrates an additional prognostic significance in survival for patients with multivessel disease. It is also indicated for symptomatic relief in patients with stable angina who are receiving optimal medical treatment in the presence of limiting angina or angina equivalent. Both coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still commonly needed as therapeutic options for pLAD disease. Moreover, Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) have demonstrated superiority in safety and efficacy among other types of second or new generation drug-eluting stents. Purpose We aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of PCI with EES compared to CABG surgery with left internal mammary artery, in patients with stable angina and an isolated single vessel pLAD disease. Methods The sample consisted of 824 patients with isolated pLAD and chronic stable angina; 445 participants were included in the EES-PCI group, and 379 were included in the CABG group. The study's primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), namely, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) not attributed to a non-target vessel and target lesion revascularization as a composite index. Secondary endpoints were Patient-Related Outcome (PRO; a composite index of all-cause mortality, any MI related to any coronary artery, any revascularization conducted to any coronary artery), individual components of MACEs, recurrence of stable or unstable angina or a nonfatal arrhythmia and disease progression of other lesions. For the comparisons between the two groups, chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests, were used, as appropriate. Results During the 4.6 years of follow-up period, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two study groups in respect to the primary endpoint MACE (8.1% versus 7.4%, p=0.71). Concerning secondary endpoints, repeat revascularization (3.6% versus 2.9%, p=0.58), cardiac death (2.9% versus 3.2%, p=0.84), MI (1.6% versus 1.3%, p=0.76) and PRO (16.9% versus 17.7%, p=0.76) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Recurrence of angina was more frequent in the EES-PCI group (14.9% versus 8.4%, p=0.005) even though higher Class of angina was found less common in EES patients than in CABG patients (p<0.001). Patients treated with EES-PCI had lower rates of onset of arrhythmias compared to those treated with CABG (6.3% versus 11.9%, p=0.005). Finally, revascularization in other than target lesion was more frequent in the stent than in the surgery arm (6.3% versus 3.2%, p=0.04); as a consequence, higher rates of revascularization in any vessel was recorded in the PCI group than the CABG one (9.9% versus 5.8%, p=0.03). Conclusion PCI with EES seem to have similar long-term clinical outcomes compared with CABG in patients with isolated pLAD disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".