MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W310940745

From Management Situations to 'Action-Territories': Lessons for Territorialized Policy. the Case of Territorial Farm Contracts in the French Departments Overseas./De la Situation De Gestion Au Territoire Actionnable Des Enseignements En Matiere De Politique Territorialisee. le Cas Des Contrats Territoriaux d'Exploitation Dans Les Departements d'Outre *

2006· article· fr· W310940745 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc Piraux, Eduardo Chia, Michel Dulcire

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationAction (physics)Order (exchange)Public spaceAgriculturePublic policySpace (punctuation)BusinessPublic administrationPolitical scienceEconomyGeographyLawEconomicsEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although public action always uses the term 'territory', it has difficulties in integrating social issues cast in territorial terms. The territory, defined as a space which has a 'sense' and which gives a 'sense' to those who live in it and which acts as a space of coordination at the local scale between civil society and public authority, is the basis of the French agricultural law of 1999. Highlighting the multifunctionality of agriculture, the law proposes a new contract between the State and farmers through the CTE (Contrat territorial d'exploitation--Territorial Farm Contract) which is the tool of choice. It is constructed from the identification of agro-environmental and economic measures developed at the regional level and based on a diagnosis undertaken by project initiators within a local territory. Today, the Agricultural Sustainable Contracts (CAD--Contrats agricoles durables) have replaced these. In order to study the territorialization of public policies, the application of the CTE was analyzed in Reunion (Indian Ocean) and in Guadeloupe (French West Indies--FWI) (two Overseas French Departments) using comprehensive surveys. In this article, we argue that public policies would gain in effectiveness if they can integrate the action system at the local level (an action system being a structured human unit able to coordinate the actions of those who participate in it and manage the stability of its actors and their interrelationships at a given time and place). We show, indeed, that modes of appropriation and practices of use of a public policy instrument (here, the CTE) are different according to the action systems in the two islands. In Reunion, where the agricultural profession is more active and better organized, where the institutions and organizations of producers are more numerous and the forms of coordination more diversified than in Guadeloupe, the professional organizations seized the tool quickly and used it to reinforce their projects, contrary to Guadeloupe where the public institutions have maintained an important role throughout the process. In terms of results, socio-technical and organizational innovations are more important and more diversified in Reunion than in Guadeloupe. But in both cases, it has not led to a questioning of the regional development model focused on exports, and there are thus still difficulties. The territory or area of the initiators of local projects, which is the territory or action space of collective action under the law, was also weak in both situations even though both have quite strong local social and ecological diversity. In order to better take account of the territorial dimension in public policies, we have drawn upon concepts from management sciences. Thus, we show that, under the injunctions of public policies and in the context of the action system in place, local actors do construct and participate in management situations. To associate a management situation with a territory, it is pertinent to focus on the process of development of consensus, on the actors' strategies, and the tools and instruments they mobilize, and on the space delimited by the actors in order to respond to a particular problem. We show that in Reunion, the public policy related to the CTE introduced a management situation initiated by the State at the regional level. It allowed a collective action between actors who did not share the same vision of the development of the island but who shared the broad goals of the CTE tool. Common tools and particular devices were thus created. If the actors succeeded in giving a direction to the application of the CTE, it was because they knew perfectly well that they were going to be the subject of very strong external or internal social assessments. On the other hand, the management situations were much rarer at the local level, and practically non-existent. This reveals the difficulty for actors in translating regional policy to the level of the territory of local actors' projects. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Regional ScienceSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207