Narrativité et jeu clownesque en service de soins palliatifs pour adultes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fruit d’un projet pilote d’un an en milieu de soins palliatifs pour adultes au Québec, cet article explore le thème de la transmission subjective qui peut avoir lieu par l’intermédiaire du jeu pour une personne en fin de vie. Des vignettes cliniques tirées du journal de bord des artistes clowns accompagnant des patientes et patients en fin de vie sont utilisées pour décrire leur expérience de la relation avec les patients ainsi que les formes de narrativité à l’oeuvre dans le contexte spécifique d’une visite clownesque en soins palliatifs. En quoi la visite du clown thérapeutique permet-elle le partage de réflexions existentielles, de craintes, d’apprentissages et de dimensions de l’identité propre de la personne? Ce qui se raconte et se transmet en présence du duo clownesque semble renouveler les manières d’entrer en relation en autorisant l’humour, parfois le rire, mais surtout la transposition par la métaphore de thèmes importants pour la patiente ou le patient et ses proches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".