MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109422018 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-iddf.74

IDDF2020-ABS-0094 Use of gastric acid suppressants and risk of disease activity exacerbation in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020· review· en· W3109422018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExacerbationInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineUlcerative colitisCochrane LibraryRelative riskGastroenterologyAspirinDiseaseMeta-analysisConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Gastric acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are common gastrointestinal medications used to manage symptoms of acid-related diseases. Studies have shown that these medications are associated with increased risk of pneumonia, vitamin deficiency, osteoporosis and fractures. Few studies have described the potential risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exacerbation among patients on gastric acid suppressants but little is known on its association. This study aims to investigate the effect of the use of gastric acid suppressants (PPI and H2RA) in the risk of IBD (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) exacerbation. <h3>Methods</h3> A comprehensive, computerized literature search from the electronic database of MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and OVID was performed with the following search terms: gastric acid suppressants, proton pump inhibitors, histamine 2 receptor antagonists, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, outcomes, and disease activity exacerbation. Two cohort studies were selected and validated using the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Trial results were combined under a random effects model using pooled relative risks (RRs). The Cochrane Review Manager Software version 5.3 was used for all analyses. <h3>Results</h3> Two cohort studies comprising of 36,293 patients were analyzed by pooling adjusted RRs using random effects model. Disease activity exacerbation was associated with the use of gastric acid suppressants with pooled adjusted RR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08–1.20, I2=0%] with no heterogeneity. The pooled adjusted RR of IBD activity exacerbation with PPI use was 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05–1.19, I2=0%] for any IBD, while the pooled adjusted RR of disease activity exacerbation with HR2A use was 1.21 [1.04–1.40, I2=42%] for IBD, with moderate heterogeneity. The effect of acid suppression was more marked in patients with Crohn’s disease, RR 1.44 [0.89–2.33, I2=77%], but this was statistically insignificant with marked heterogeneity; than in ulcerative colitis RR 1.12 [1.05–1.20, I2=0%]. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Use of gastric acid suppressants such as PPIs and H2Ras may be associated with increased risk of disease activity exacerbation in patients with IBD. This meta-analysis confirms the need for further prospective studies in examining this relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it