MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109499619 · doi:10.4000/critiquedart.46795

CARF 01 – FRAC Champagne-Ardenne

2018· article· fr· W3109499619 on OpenAlexaff
Fanny Ollivier

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique d’art · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsCanadian Anesthesia Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans ce premier numéro de CARF, le FRAC Champagne-Ardenne nous propose une rétrospective de ses expositions, interventions et performances de 2018. La publication, annuelle et bilingue français-anglais, s’ouvre sur l’éditorial de Marie Griffay, directrice du FRAC, qui interroge l’individualité et le collectif dans l’espace du jeu et plus largement dans l’art et dans la société. Photographies et textes – écrits d’artistes, d’historiennes de l’art, de commissaires d’exposition – invitent à pens...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritique d’artSame topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207