MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109500706 · doi:10.4000/caliban.3509

Cronon, Thoreau et l’idée de la nature sauvage

2016· article· fr· W3109500706 on OpenAlexaff
François Specq

Bibliographic record

VenueCaliban · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessHostilityEnvironmental ethicsSociologyPower (physics)EpistemologyHumanitiesPhilosophyEcologyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay seeks to reconsider William Cronon's well-known critique of the wilderness idea in "The Trouble with Wilderness," which has been most influential for the past twenty years. While Cronon's deconstructive approach has usefully drawn attention to some problems inherent in the notion of wilderness, I will argue that the historian was carried away by his hostility to the "Deep Ecology" movement to the point of failing to acknowledge the intellectual validity and creative power of this challenging idea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.025
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalibanSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207