De la recherche-action à la conférence spectacle participative : la tradition chantée et dansée en Nouvelle-Acadie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la région de Lanaudière, Philippe Jetté et Mélanie Boucher se sont donné la mission de transmettre aux Lanaudois et Lanaudoises le patrimoine immatériel propre au territoire. Interpellé par une approche intimiste et dynamique de la transmission, le duo propose des conférences spectacles participatives, dont leur projet Chansons et réflexions intimes, dans un salon ouvert ! lancé à l’automne 2018. Ainsi, le couple s’invite chez six familles afin d’explorer avec eux la vie familiale de la chanson de tradition orale. Unique en son genre, leur création est un essai vivant croisant le théâtre, le spectacle, la veillée traditionnelle et la médiation culturelle. L’article propose d’étudier le parcours de ces médiateurs, eux-mêmes porteurs de tradition, et cette activité novatrice qui leur a valu le prix Desjardins 2019 d’innovation culturelle dans Lanaudière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".