MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MANAGEMENT OF TERRITORIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: PROJECT APPROACH

2020· article· en· W3109685781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Economics” · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProject managementExtreme project managementProgram managementContext (archaeology)Project management triangleOPM3Process managementComputer scienceBusinessEngineering managementManagement scienceKnowledge managementSystems engineeringEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urgency of the research topic is due to the need for rapid response of regions to changing environmental processes in the context of the spread of digitalization and active introduction of innovative technologies. It has been determined that in the modern market economy project management becomes a necessary factor in ensuring the competitive advantage of many regions. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need for a project approach to the management of economic development of territories. Based on the use of methods of analysis, synthesis, scientific abstraction and logical generalization, trends in the evolutionary development of project management have been identified. It has been substantiated that project management forms advantages and unique competencies that are necessary for highly efficient and successful functioning of territories in a competitive market environment, in the realities Науковий вісник Мукачівського державного університету, 2020 140 of the new economic situation, which is characterized by significant speeds and dynamics of change in certain areas. It has been proved that one of the new alternative directions in the development of project management is flexible project management. It is determined that at the level of regional management the project approach can be used both for the implementation of individual projects and in the implementation of targeted programs. It has been proved that an integral part of the successful implementation of regional projects is the formation of a system of training methods and tools of project management. The foreign experience of project management application at the regional level has been analyzed and three key models have been revealed: american, european, canadian. The key principles of using the project approach to the management of economic development of territories have been identified, namely: systemicity, integration, balance, dynamism, decomposition, competence. The practical significance lies in identifying the features of the project approach to regional development management, which must be taken into account: openness and publicity of regional projects; increased control over the targeted use of local budget funds for regional projects; the complexity of assessing the effectiveness of the regional project; difficulties in setting priorities and differentiating regional projects. Key words: economic development, project management, regional development, flexible management methods, regional projects, project approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it