MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109744881 · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00057

In Situ Noise Characterization of the D-Wave Quantum Annealer

2020· article· en· W3109744881 on OpenAlexafffund
Tristan Zaborniak, Rogério de Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQubitFlux qubitPhysicsQuantum annealingSuperposition principleCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Quantum mechanicsQuantum computerNoise (video)QuantumQuantum noiseHamiltonian (control theory)Quantum error correctionStatistical physicsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various sources of noise limit the performance of quantum computers based on superconducting flux qubits by altering their states in an uncontrolled manner throughout computations and reducing their coherence time. In quantum annealers, this introduces fluctuations to the linear constants of the original problem Hamiltonian, such that they find the ground states of problems perturbed from those programmed. Here we describe how to turn this drawback into a method to probe the frequency dependence of the noise in situ of the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer. The method relates the autocorrelation of the readout-state of a qubit repeatedly collapsed from uniform superposition to that of the noise impingent on the qubit. We show that this leads to an estimate for the noise spectral density affecting D-Wave qubits under normal operating conditions. The method is general and can be used to characterize noise in all architectures for quantum annealing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207