An Automated CAD System of CT Chest Images for COVID-19 Based on Genetic Algorithm and K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The detection of COVID-19 from computed tomography (CT) scans suffered from inaccuracies due to its difficulty in data acquisition and radiologist errors. Therefore, a fully automated computer-aided detection (CAD) system is proposed to detect coronavirus versus non-coronavirus images. In this paper, a total of 200 images for coronavirus and non-coronavirus are employed based on 90% for training images and 10% testing images. The proposed system comprised five stages for organizing the virus prevalence. In the first stage, the images are preprocessed by thresholding-based lung segmentation. Afterward, the feature extraction technique was performed on segmented images, while the genetic algorithm performed on sixty-four extracted features to adopt the superior features. In the final stage, the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and decision tree are applied for COVID-19 classification. The findings of this paper confirmed that the KNN classifier with K=3 is accomplished for COVID-19 detection with high accuracy of 100% on CT images. However, the decision tree for COVID-19 classification is achieved 95% accuracy. This system is used to facilitate the radiologist’s role in the prediction of COVID-19 images. This system will prove to be valuable to the research community working on automation of COVID-19 images prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".