Dual Mobility Cup: Does It Improve Patient's Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective Comparative Randomized Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite the great success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), many patients were fairly dissatisfied after surgery. Therefore, patient-reported outcome measures have become of an utmost importance in assessing the results after joint replacement. This study was conducted to compare the postoperative patient-reported satisfactions after implantation of two commonly used THA designs. METHODS: Of 180 patients, who initially fulfilled the study selection criteria and received cementless THA, 165 patients were finally eligible and enrolled in this prospective comparative randomized study. All surgeries were carried out between 2010 and 2018. Two groups of homogenous demographic and clinical data were present. Group A patients (n = 80) were treated by large head THA, whereas group B (n = 85) received dual mobility cup designs. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analog scale were used for clinical evaluation. The degree of improvement that the patient expected and hoped before undergoing their surgeries was estimated using the score of the new knee society. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale was used to record the levels of patient satisfaction after surgery, and their values were statistically analyzed in relation to preoperative expectation scores (ie, score of the new knee society) and different clinical and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 79 ± 4.13 months (range 24 to 96 months), both groups recorded a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analogue scale scores. Patients of group B were significantly more satisfied (P < 0.05) than those of group A up to the first postoperative year. Certain studied variables were linked to superior satisfaction results among group B at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Dual mobility THA provides better patient satisfaction than their standard large head alternatives specifically among elderly patients, socially unsupported individuals, farmers, heavy manual workers, and those with high levels of expectations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04333316.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".