Service Optimization of Production Process of Polyester Fiber Based on Immune and Endocrine Regulation Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A service optimization method for polyester fiber production process is proposed. According to the production batch and production specifications, the method considers the service cost as the optimization objective, and uses data model to determine the specific process parameters in the polyester fiber production process. First, two options for the overall process of polyester fiber are introduced: on-demand manufacturing and product development. Second, the impact of different batch request tasks on the performance index of each stage is determined. Finally, the service optimization measures of different batches are proposed. By comparing the similarity between the current data samples and the overall data, the optimal production plan of the overall production process is formed. Simulation results show that the immune algorithm inspired from endocrine regulation has the best performance on the optimal decision-making combination, which is helpful for the development of new polyester products. We investigate how to reduce energy consumption of system resources, and how to choose the best service from a large number of candidate services. In the overall polyester fiber production process, users are not only consumers, but also designers and producers, achieving the real “integration of production and consumption”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".