MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109841362 · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.11.005

Survival Trends of Metastatic Lung Cancer in California by Age at Diagnosis, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Histology, 1990-2014

2020· article· en· W3109841362 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tianhong Li, Kevin Pan, Amy K. Ellinwood, Rosemary D. Cress

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Lung Cancer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionEurostarsUniversity of California, San FranciscoCenters for Disease Control and PreventionComprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, DavisFoundation MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaCancer Registry of Greater CaliforniaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer InstituteIllinois Department of Public HealthTempusCalifornia Department of Public HealthPublic Health InstituteMerckResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and LabradorPfizerEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerRace (biology)Ethnic groupHistologyOncologyInternal medicineGerontologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueClinical Lung CancerSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207