MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109873937 · doi:10.1063/5.0029711

Two-dimensional convection–diffusion in multipolar flows with applications in microfluidics and groundwater flow

2020· article· en· W3109873937 on OpenAlexafffund
Étienne Boulais, Thomas Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPéclet numberPhysicsMechanicsLaminar flowMicrofluidicsReynolds numberDiffusionConvectionFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advection–diffusion in two-dimensional plane flows plays a key role in numerous transport problems in physics, including groundwater flow, micro-scale sensing, heat dissipation, and, in general, microfluidics. However, transport profiles are usually only known in a purely convective approximation or for the simplest geometries, such as for quasi one-dimensional planar microchannels. This situation greatly limits the use of these models as design tools for fully 2D planar flows. We present a complete analysis of the problem of convection–diffusion in low Reynolds number 2D flows with distributions of singularities, such as those found in open-space microfluidics and in groundwater flows. Using Boussinesq transformations and solving the problem in streamline coordinates, we obtain concentration profiles in flows with complex arrangements of sources and sinks for both high and low Peclet numbers. These yield the complete analytical concentration profile at every point in applications such as microfluidic probes, groundwater heat pumps, or diffusive flows in porous media, which previously relied on material surface tracking, local lump models, or numerical analysis. Using conformal transforms, we generate families of symmetrical solutions from simple ones and provide a general methodology that can be used to analyze any arrangement of source and sinks. The solutions obtained include explicit dependence on the various parameters of the problems, such as Pe, the spacing of the apertures, and their relative injection and aspiration rates. We then show how these same models can be used to model diffusion in confined geometries, such as channel junctions and chambers, and give examples for classic microfluidic devices such as T-mixers and hydrodynamic focusing. The high Pe models can model problems with Pe as low as 1 with a maximum error committed of under 10%, and this error decreases approximately as Pe−1.5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207