Two-dimensional convection–diffusion in multipolar flows with applications in microfluidics and groundwater flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advection–diffusion in two-dimensional plane flows plays a key role in numerous transport problems in physics, including groundwater flow, micro-scale sensing, heat dissipation, and, in general, microfluidics. However, transport profiles are usually only known in a purely convective approximation or for the simplest geometries, such as for quasi one-dimensional planar microchannels. This situation greatly limits the use of these models as design tools for fully 2D planar flows. We present a complete analysis of the problem of convection–diffusion in low Reynolds number 2D flows with distributions of singularities, such as those found in open-space microfluidics and in groundwater flows. Using Boussinesq transformations and solving the problem in streamline coordinates, we obtain concentration profiles in flows with complex arrangements of sources and sinks for both high and low Peclet numbers. These yield the complete analytical concentration profile at every point in applications such as microfluidic probes, groundwater heat pumps, or diffusive flows in porous media, which previously relied on material surface tracking, local lump models, or numerical analysis. Using conformal transforms, we generate families of symmetrical solutions from simple ones and provide a general methodology that can be used to analyze any arrangement of source and sinks. The solutions obtained include explicit dependence on the various parameters of the problems, such as Pe, the spacing of the apertures, and their relative injection and aspiration rates. We then show how these same models can be used to model diffusion in confined geometries, such as channel junctions and chambers, and give examples for classic microfluidic devices such as T-mixers and hydrodynamic focusing. The high Pe models can model problems with Pe as low as 1 with a maximum error committed of under 10%, and this error decreases approximately as Pe−1.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".