Predicting aggressive histopathological features in esophageal cancer with positron emission tomography using a deep convolutional neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) are of great prognostic importance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Currently, positron emission tomography (PET) scans are the only means of functional assessment prior to treatment. We aimed to predict the presence of LVI and PNI in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using PET imaging data by training a three-dimensional convolution neural network (3D-CNN). METHODS: Seven hundred and ninety-eight PET scans of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 309 PET scans of patients with stage I lung cancer were collected. In the first part of this study, we built a 3D-CNN based on a residual network, ResNet, for a task to classify the scans into esophageal cancer or lung cancer. In the second stage, we collected the PET scans of 278 patients undergoing esophagectomy for a task to classify and predict the presence of LVI/PNI. RESULTS: In the first part, the model performance attained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.860. In the second part, we randomly split 80%, 10%, and 10% of our dataset into training set, validation set and testing set, respectively, for a task to classify the scans into the presence of LVI/PNI and evaluated the model performance on the testing set. Our 3D-CNN model attained an AUC of 0.668 in the testing set, which shows a better discriminative ability than random guessing. CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-CNN can be trained, using PET imaging datasets, to predict LNV/PNI in esophageal cancer with acceptable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".