NOTAS SOBRE ALGUNS DOCUMENTOS INEXPLORADOS PARA A HISTÓRIA DE ANGOLA: OS RÓIS DOS CONFESSADOS DE 1704
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho baseia-se numa fonte quantitativa que tem sido utilizada por historiadoras(es) nas últimas décadas, os róis ou arrolamentos de confessados. No caso particular de Angola, esta documentação contém informações demográficas dos indivíduos e da(s) família(s) que habitavam os fogos pertencentes às freguesias do Bispado de Angola no ano de 1704. Tendo como finalidade listar os fregueses que haviam cumprido seus deveres religiosos, o rol de confessados de Angola de 1704 não só permite compreender as estruturas de populações que antecederam o desenvolvimento de recenseamentos no final do século XVIII, mas também nos possibilita investigar os padrões de família, de habitação, de riqueza ou pobreza dos moradores e soldados e, especialmente, o número de escravos que esses indivíduos possuíam. Esta contribuição descreve essas possibilidades, com foco no presídio de Muxima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".